🖐 Why Casino Craps Can't Be Beaten by Bryce Carlson - Blogs - Blackjack Forum, the Blackjack Community

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🔥

Filter:
Sort:
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Beat the Craps Out of the Casinos: How to Play and Win [Frank Scoblete] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Until now, craps has been considered an unbeatable casino game because the house has an edge on every bet.


Enjoy!
Why Casino Craps Can't Be Beaten by Bryce Carlson - Blogs - Blackjack Forum, the Blackjack Community
Valid for casinos
How to Beat a Casino at Craps: Tips to Win at Craps
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

How to Win at Craps. It's easy to find the craps tables on any casino floor - just follow the shouts! Perhaps no other game in the casino offers the sort of communal thrills and spills as craps.


Enjoy!
Casino Wars - Beating Vegas (Gambling Documentary) - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Casino Wars - Beating Vegas (Gambling Documentary) - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
In this article, I am going to give you some terrific craps strategy tips for you to learn how to win almost every time you play.
Discover how beating craps at casinos beat a casino at craps with the only tips that work.
Learn the best strategy tips to win at craps from our team of professionals and discover how to play like a winner!
We all love craps and we would all love to win at craps every time we play.
While there is no sure-fire five-minute strategy that will teach you how to play craps and win every time, there are a bunch of strategy tips and smart bets that can maximise your chances of winning.
Playing craps online or at your favorite land-based casino can provide tons of excitement along with the promises of a huge payday - provided you know how to use the best craps strategy and you know how to choose and size your bets correctly.
In this article, I am going to run you through all the most common strategy tips to win at craps.
I will show you how to pick the right bet every time you play and how you understand when the house edge is too high for you to stay in the game.
Throughout the article, you will find references to concepts like, and the way.
If any of these sounds foreign to beating craps at casinos, remember to check out the articles I just linked before you sit at the craps table.
Rolling the dice is simple, but it will take you a lot more than that to find the right strategy to win at craps every time you play and beat the house.
Craps Strategy to Beat Stockton ca Casino Rules are boring, I know.
To help you get started, I set up a rules page.
Together with the game's rules, that article gives you some useful strategy tips on bankroll management and practical advice on how to limit your losses.
The key to winning at craps is to learn what bets you can go for and what bets you need to avoid every time you play.
The only way you can do so is if you know the house edge connected to each one of the bets in the game.
Picking any of the four bets indicated above reduces the house advantage to 1.
This is the best you can get in craps, especially if you combine it with laying or taking odds in order to reduce the percentage advantage even more.
Anyone familiar with the basics of the craps optimal strategy know that all the other bets come with worse conditions and a higher house edge.
Bets like the Hard-Way 4 and the Hard-Way 10 have an house edge of 11%.
Picking the right bets is the key to winning at craps every time you bc casinos vancouver />The next time you open a crap tablehave a look at what people bet on before you start playing.
That number alone is the best mystical free slots that picking the right bets and going for the lowest house edge is the only strategy you should adopt if you want to win at craps every time.
The only way you will be respected by pro players and the dealers is if you show them you know this principle beating craps at casinos you stick to these safe bets when you play craps.
The low house edge makes the Pass bet the most popular one in the game.
With an house advantage of 1.
The Come bet is equally popular and lets you win every time you or the shooter hit a 7 or 11 after the come bet is made.
You lose the Come bet only when you or the shooter hit a 2,3,12.
Wrong bettors win whenever the other lose and lose when the other players win - which, in a gambling game like craps, is going to happen often.
Whenever you opt for this bet, you casino wendover nevada if the 3 or 2 is hit after the point has been made, and you tie if a 12 is rolled.
Payout and House Edge of All the Bets in Craps While the best explained above are the ones the optimal strategy to win at craps suggests, the game features a lot of other bets with different house edges.
Craps Bets Bets Payout House Edge Pass 1 to 1 1.
If your bankroll is limited and I am pretty sure it isyou should limits the amount you press on the lay or place odds unless you want to be pushed out of the game after a single bad roll.
Each table comes with a different sets of rules and limits.
Make sure you ask the dealer if learn more here the info you need are not available at the table.
If you are looking to have more action at the table, you should at all costs stay away from most prop bets and stick to the Place and Lay bets.
Like in all gambling games, the key to beating a casino at craps is to walk away while you are ahead.
As soon as the hot-streak ends, take a break, Cash your winnings and leave the table.
The 4-Minute Guide to Craps Strategy Besides being an beating craps at casinos video and I tend to agree with Roman Praha on the redhead being highthis is video is pure gold.
Plus, if you liked Leisure Suit Larry you will love this one.
The Mathematics of Craps In this video, former craps dealer at the Hilton Las Vegas, Jim Luciano drives you through the numbers of craps to explain how to calculate odds, payouts, and winning chances.
This video complements the section of this article dedicated to the bets and the odds.
The 10-Minute Full Craps Strategy Course This video features everything you need to become a pro.
Watch it once you are familiar with the numbers in the game and the use these craps strategy tips from the Players Network to beat the house!
The Five-Count Strategy Beating craps at casinos In the beating craps at casinos below Gaming author, Frank Scoblete, describes the so-called Five-Count System, an alternative craps strategy you can read on hit book Beat the Craps Out of the Casinos The five-count system begins when a shooter rolls a point number of 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, or 10.
Once any of these numbers is rolled, beating craps at casinos next roll is the two-count.
Assuming there is a third roll, here is where you would start betting with a come bet.
If the roll continues, it is considered to be the four-count where you would place another come bet.
Once it reaches a five-count, here is where you would start to place odds on your come bets and also make your third come bet.
I tested all the casinos in this list to make sure they all had good craps games and that you could use my craps strategy tips to win every time!
Disclaimer: Gambling is a game of chance and there's no something spokane tribe casino airway heights question formula that guarantee winnings.
You can improve your winning chances by using the right in-game strategies but there is no way to predict when a machine or a Casino game is going to pay.
Also, this page contains affiliate links.
If you click through and play, we might earn a commission.
Subscribe to our newsletter list and get the latest casino news, strategies and special offers sent directly to your inbox!

T7766547
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

In some casinos, however, the shooter is permitted to keep playing until he craps out. While most readers will be familiar with the rules of craps, this should give beginners a basic idea of how the game is played. If you want to know more, I suggest consulting a quality craps glossary.


Enjoy!
Why Casino Craps Can't Be Beaten by Bryce Carlson - Blogs - Blackjack Forum, the Blackjack Community
Valid for casinos
Beating Casino - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
How to Win at Casino Every Time - Craps Betting Strategy

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Yes you can make a living playing craps, the most exciting game in the casino. Get the top craps system which was developed and perfected by a professional gambler.


Enjoy!
Casino Wars - Beating Vegas (Gambling Documentary) - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Why Casino Craps Can't Be Beaten by Bryce Carlson - Blogs - Blackjack Forum, the Blackjack Community
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

TT6335644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

The Cromwell is the only Strip casino to have 100x odds on craps. This is by far, the most generous odds in Las Vegas, and certainly on the Strip, as no other Strip joint even goes to 10x odds. Most casinos on the strip, (including the Casino Royale now), only offer the standard 3x,4x,5x odds.


Enjoy!
Beating Casino - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Casino Wars - Beating Vegas (Gambling Documentary) - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Win $300 per hour - craps strategy

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Bonus abuse used to be the only way to beat online casinos at their own game, but the days of betting both Pass and Don’t pass are unfortunately long gone. As it stands, beating the casinos at craps or any other game with a house edge is impossible.


Enjoy!
How to Beat a Casino at Craps: Tips to Win at Craps
Valid for casinos
Why Casino Craps Can't Be Beaten by Bryce Carlson - Blogs - Blackjack Forum, the Blackjack Community
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Players must play the casino 3.
After depositing and playing, please send your casino username and PayPal in willits ca to the following email: casinovideos gmail.
PayPal rebate may take up to 7 days to appear in your account 5.
Rebate is made via PayPal only 1.
Get https://eronline.ru/casino/route-66-casino-hotel-discounts.html 400% Match bonus on deposit at Royal Ace Casino.
Use code CASINO400 also accepting U.
Get your casino rewards at Bodog.
The more you play, the more you earn!
The blackjack beating craps at casinos in this video will sharpen your game and make you play better around source live casino tables as well as while playing at beating craps at casinos online casino.
Never do this in Blackjack 1:19 — Tip 3.
Tipping the dealer, yes or no?
Playing with 1, 5, 6 or 8 decks?
Card shuffler and counting cards 2:41 — Tip 7.
Where to sit around the blackjack table?
Insurance, yes or no?
Progressive betting 3:45 — Casino dublin 10.
Emotions at Blackjack 4:02 — Tip 11.
Tips and strategies to help you become a better player and win the games of Roulette, Beating craps at casinos, Blackjack and other casino games both online and live.
Winning tips and strategies to master the game of roulette and win the game at live and online casinos.
Winning tips and strategies to win the fun and popular casino game of video poker, both live and online.

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

How ‘Advantage Players’ Game the Casinos. They’re not cheaters. Instead, they hone the sharpest (legal) edge they can.. that makes its craps iteration more difficult to beat. Grosjean.


Enjoy!
Beating Casino - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Casino Wars - Beating Vegas (Gambling Documentary) - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

John Matarese reports on which casino games give you the best chance of winning.. Craps. So from the Blackjack table, he suggests moving on to the dice game Craps, the game with the second best.


Enjoy!
Beating Casino - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Why Casino Craps Can't Be Beaten by Bryce Carlson - Blogs - Blackjack Forum, the Blackjack Community
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Craps: How to Play and How to Win - Part 1 - with Casino Gambling Expert Steve Bourie

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

John Matarese reports on which casino games give you the best chance of winning.. Craps. So from the Blackjack table, he suggests moving on to the dice game Craps, the game with the second best.


Enjoy!
How to Beat a Casino at Craps: Tips to Win at Craps
Valid for casinos
How to Beat a Casino at Craps: Tips to Win at Craps
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Fastest Winning Craps System!

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Beat the Craps Out of the Casinos: How to Play and Win [Frank Scoblete] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Until now, craps has been considered an unbeatable casino game because the house has an edge on every bet.


Enjoy!
Why Casino Craps Can't Be Beaten by Bryce Carlson - Blogs - Blackjack Forum, the Blackjack Community
Valid for casinos
How to Beat a Casino at Craps: Tips to Win at Craps
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
You will have to free before you can post: click the r e g i s t e r link to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Even though this site is primarily dedicated to AP blackjack, several members have indicated that they're also interested in the possibility of beating casino craps, as well.
I also wondered about this, but after several years of study and research I determined that, unfortunately, casino craps cannot be beaten with legitimate play.
I hope you guys enjoy it.
But he wasn't, and there isn't.
And therein lies a fascinating tale that is worth a little trip down history lane.
For, you see, at its core, the potential to beat craps comes down to the nature of kinetic energy.
But Newton didn't believe in energy, kinetic or otherwise.
For him there was no such thing!
For Newton, there was mass and there was motion.
And that was it.
Newton knew that unless acted upon by an outside force bodies in motion stayed in motion, and bodies at rest stayed at rest.
So, Newton reasoned that when an outside force acted on a body at rest to create motion it had to impart an "impetus" to the body which overcame the body's inherent inertia.
This force imparted an check this out, P, sufficient to move a mass, m, to a velocity, v.
And that was all there was to it.
But Newton, perhaps the greatest genius of all time, had a bitter rival of almost equal genius.
His name was Gottfried Leibniz.
And Leibniz had a different idea.
He thought there was more to motion than momentum.
He said there was also a "vis viva" or "life force," proportional to the square of the velocity, that a mass acquires when it's accelerated to a given velocity with respect to another inertial frame.
Newton countered by mocking the whole idea of a putative so-called "life force" as superstitious nonsense, and sarcastically asked Leibniz if perhaps the laying on of hands were necessary to impart this special force to masses, and, if so, did it come by the power of God or perhaps Beelzebub.
Leibniz replied that, like everything else, it came by the power of God, and if Newton doubted that perhaps he should take it up with the Pope, or maybe the Archbishop of Canterbury.
And so back and forth it went, year after year, such that during their lifetimes this bitter little tête-à-tête remained unabated, undecided and unresolved -- just one more schlong slam in a long list of schlong slams by two of the greatest minds and brittlest egos in the entire history of great minds and brittle egos.
And then, in 1738, several years after both Newton and Leibniz had died, along came a rather comely young minx by the name of Mme Gabrielle Émilie du Châtelet.
Now, Mme du Châtelet, who happened to be the wife of the Marquis du Châtelet, was not only a libertine deluxe of impressive imagination, but she was also the mistress of Voltaire, several of beating craps at casinos friends, and a gifted young woman who somehow amid all the frolicking found time to be an accomplished natural philosopher, as well.
This was definitely not your everyday wench, royalty or not.
Now, Mme du Châtelet was a keen student of both Leibniz and Newton in fact her French translation of Newton's Principia is still the standardand she marveled that this dispute regarding the fundamental nature of masses in motion had gone on for decades without a resolution.
So, she decided to set up an experiment to settle the matter once and for all.
She reasoned that in an inelastic collision of a rigid undeformable mass with a non-rigid deformable one all of Newton's momentum or Leibniz's vis viva would be absorbed by the deformable mass, and the degree of deformation would determine who was right.
So she set up a simple but elegant experiment in which a small steel cannonball was dropped from a height of several feet into a bucket of potter's clay and the depth of the depression left by the ball was measured.
Then, using Newton's gravity equations, she dropped the ball from a greater height, such that the velocity at impact was calculated to be exactly twice the velocity of the first drop, and, again, measured the depth of the depression left by the ball.
But, if the second depression were four times as deep as the first one, then Leibniz would be right.
So, she performed the experiment and measured the results and, voilà, the second depression was, indeed, four times as deep as the first one.
Leibniz had been right all along.
Poor Leibniz, he had waited a lifetime to beat Newton at something important, and when he finally did he wasn't alive to enjoy it.
Sometimes, the Gods really do have a twisted sense of humor.
Leibniz would be proud.
Okay, so why is it so important that Newton was wrong and Leibniz was right?
It's important because it says that a small change in velocity results in a large change in kinetic energy, which means that when, say, two dice are thrown simultaneously with only a small difference in initial velocity, the differences in their behavior at impact will be large.
Processes in nature tend to either damp or amp as they propagate through space and time.
In those that damp, small differences in initial conditions the Δ of the initial complex Lagrangians become even smaller over time.
But in those that amp, small differences in initial conditions grow learn more here over time.
And because kinetic energy is an exponential function of the square of velocity, tossing dice at craps is an amping process, whereby small differences in initial conditions result in large chaotic differences in the final results.
Now, over the last five years a number visit web page serious, legitimate researchers, including Stanford Wong, myself and others, have sought to determine the truth about so-called AP craps.
Some of these researchers have hoped to show that craps could be beaten, and some have just been intellectually curious.
But, regardless of motive, all of them have diligently searched for the truth.
Now, because simulations of precision shooting at casino craps are not feasible, these researchers have generally utilized carefully monitored casino sessions of statistically significant duration with recognized "professional" p-shooters, as well as slow-motion videos of such experts throwing the dice on regulation craps tables, to obtain valid useful data.
The results of such studies have been telling.
Virtually without exception, with the monitored "professional" p-shooters the larger the number of trials the more random the results appear with each die face converging on a random frequency of 1 in 6.
And with the slow-motion videos, it is obvious to everyone viewing them that, no matter how good the throw might look at normal speed, in slow motion it is apparent that a huge amount of beating craps at casinos randomizing occurs.
In fact, in February, 2009, Wong stated in a post on the bj21.
Watching slo-mo video of dice tosses can be discouraging, and can be harmful to sales of dice books and to sales of dice-tossing instruction.
So, while it is true that no one study is ever completely conclusive, over a five-year period the evidence has piled up as study after study by capable researchers has consistently pointed to only one conclusion: Real-world casino craps cannot be legitimately beaten -- by anyone, anywhere, at any time.
And the exponential, amping nature of kinetic energy is the fundamental reason why.
To see beating craps at casinos more clearly consider this analogy: Suppose a world-class MLB pitcher were told to throw curve balls one after another such that each successive pair of curve balls must be thrown at the same speed to within a small fraction of a mile per hour, and have the same curving trajectory within a small fraction of an inch.
No pitcher could ever do this, or would ever even want to, for that matter.
It's not humanly possible.
But that is exactly the kind of control a p-shooter would have to have to have any chance of influencing the dice at all.
And even if it were possible, which it isn't, it STILL wouldn't be enough!
link this: The theory of so-called AP craps is built on two plausible-sounding conjectures.
The first one, promoted by Frank Learn more here and Golden Touch Craps, says that if the dice are set properly, thrown on axis with synchronicity, and don't hit the pyramid-studded back wall or at most just "kiss" it lightly with a dead-cat bounceit is possible to exert a sufficient degree of beating craps at casinos of the dice to achieve a positive ev.
We'll call this the GTC conjecture.
The second one, promoted by Wong, says that if the dice are set properly, and initially thrown on axis with synchronicity, even if they do hit the pyramid-studded back wall hard, a degree of "correlation" between the two dice can survive that is sufficient to achieve a positive ev.
We'll call this the Wong conjecture.
Let's consider the GTC conjecture first.
On the face of it, it sounds reasonable.
It's definitely a plausible-sounding conjecture.
If the dice are set properly, please click for source stay on axis with synchronicity right to the end, there is no question that sufficient control to achieve a positive ev would result.
That's why check this out so seductive.
It sounds doable, if difficult.
It sounds like all it takes is practice.
But, as it turns out, it takes a hell of a lot more than that.
Slow-motion studies of expert throws have repeatedly shown that even if the dice apparently remain on axis with synchronicity right down to the landing something extraordinarily difficult to doif the dice differ by even 0.
Such tosses look great at normal speed, but in slow motion, even on a relatively "dead" table surface, their true random nature can be seen and measured.
As with a pitcher trying to throw successive pairs of identical curve balls, the precision necessary to do it with dice is beyond human capability.
And that's not even counting the pyramid-studded back wall!
When you factor in the pyramids, the whole concept becomes laughable.
Now, let's take a look at the last best hope for AP casino craps, namely, the Wong conjecture.
Wong is a bright fellow, and he recognized from his early dice studies that maintaining on-axis synchronicity was a pipe dream.
So, still hopeful that craps could be beaten, he developed a more sophisticated theory that posits that, although the dice do not remain on axis with synchronicity after contact with the table and back-wall pyramids, there is a surviving correlation between the two dice's rotations that can potentially reduce double-pitch 7s resulting in a positive ev for the player.
Specifically, Wong asserted that although the pyramids scramble pitch, roll and yaw such that the axis that each die finally assumes will be effectively randomized, a surviving correlation between the two dice may still remain because, 1 due to the law of conservation of energy, 2 the assertion that both dice start off with the same initial kinetic energy, and 3 the assertion that translational kinetic energy is not preferentially converted into rotational kinetic energy, the number of rotations the two dice undergo across their x, y, z axes, respectively, will remain closely correlated.
In Wong's own words: "Ideally, the dice are still on axis and have equal speed and equal rotation when they hit the pyramids.
The pyramids then randomize the axis of rotation of each die, and reduce the energy of each die approximately equally.
As they leave the wall the dice have random and independent axes of rotation, but will rotate approximately the same number of times before coming to rest.
Being approximately identical in position and motion when they hit the pyramids, and then rotating approximately the same number of times after hitting the pyramids, the end result should be a scarcity of double pitches.
The first one is the fallacy that both dice start off synchronized with the same initial kinetic energy.
Numerous empirical studies have shown that there is always a slight difference in the initial velocities and axial alignments of the two dice and, as previously discussed, because of the exponential amping nature of kinetic energy, these small differences result in big differences in the final results.
And secondly, and just as important, the assertion that a rotational correlation between the two dice is maintained during the toss because translational kinetic energy is either not converted into rotational kinetic energy, or, if it is, it is converted to the same degree in both dice, is manifestly false.
This is easily verified when slow-motion videos of expert tosses on regulation craps tables are examined and analyzed.
For example, one die, say, bounces up from the table and squarely hits the base of one of the pyramids and rebounds back with little to no conversion of translational kinetic energy into rotational kinetic energy; the other die, however, bounces up and hits another pyramid, say, a little off center or a little higher up from its base and a significant amount of translational kinetic energy gets converted into primarily roll and yaw rotational kinetic energy.
So, with pitch, roll, yaw and rotation randomized by the table and the pyramids, the assumptions underpinning Wong's correlation conjecture, just as with the GTC on-axis conjecture, do not stand up to either theoretical analysis or the empirical evidence, and, consequently, no surviving correlation between the two dice can be assumed to survive a legal toss in real-world casino craps.
And, again, extensive empirical studies over a five-year period back this conclusion up.
And finally, in April 2011, in a tacit admission that he had been wrong in believing casino craps could be legitimately beaten, Wong removed craps from the list of "Beatable Casino Games" on his popular bj21.
In addition, a few months later, in October 2011, in an interview about craps on Bob Dancer's popular KLAV radio program, "Gambling With an Edge," Wong admitted that, rather than craps, "if you want to get serious about making money from beating craps at casinos />So, blame it on Leibniz, blame it on God, or blame it on the exponential amping nature of kinetic energy, but real-world casino craps cannot be beaten.
But, hey, cheer up, maybe in another universe, far, far away Newton was actually right .
Now, compare this modern casino game to the primitive WWII-era "blanket-roll" game, where the consensus is that a highly-skilled virtuoso p-shooter could, indeed, potentially gain a winning edge.
What is apparent in such a comparison is that the two things that prevent beating the modern casino game -- namely, the exponential amping nature of kinetic energy, and the randomizing power of the back-wall pyramids -- were absent or neutralized in the blanket-roll game.
In the blanket-roll game there were no back-wall pyramids, and the soft, relatively high-friction army-style blanket was perfect for burning off kinetic energy very rapidly, thus effectively neutralizing kinetic energy's amping nature.
This makes for two very different games, one potentially beatable, and the other not.
They say casinos are born at night, but clearly not last night, as they have very effectively eliminated the exploitable weaknesses in the primitive blanket-roll game.
Now, even though all this means that so-called AP casino craps is left without any credible operational theory or supporting evidence, whatsoever, justifying a belief in its validity, I know none of it is going to have the slightest effect on the so-called AP craps gurus.
They'll just keep on beatin' the drums, pounding out that voodoo vibe for their faithful fans who are all too happy for a rationalization, any rationalization, to justify their inveterate gambling habits.
And does any of it prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that casino craps can't be beaten?
We'll probably never have that kind of proof.
But it does prove beyond casino paris ile de france carte reasonable doubt that casino craps is unbeatable, and in an existential world that is enough for reasonable men.
I have practiced for about a year and half.
I agree with your well written article.
I had held out hope that Wong could be right with his correlation theory but alas it never held up for me.
I had thought Wong was onto something when he used the all seven set to throw less sevens but that did not work either.
I also found the same thing when viewing the dice in slow motion there was much more random movement then thought.
In theory though it sounds good as you do not need to make the seven not show up for that many more rolls to turn the best bets on the table into positive bets.
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 About Blackjack: The Forum BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity.
That click here, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved.
The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage.
To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side.
Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.
Copyright © 2018All rights reserved.
Blackjack Forum is a message board.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this forum are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the management.

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Play and practice Craps like never before. The interactive application not only helps you learn Craps but you can also practice your strategy before heading to Las Vegas. The dice is completely random and the game play is exactly how it will be in a real Casino. This app has been created by casino experts to match the real craps experience.


Enjoy!
Casino Wars - Beating Vegas (Gambling Documentary) - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Beating Casino - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

The only book that gives you everything you need to get a real, verifiable edge at the game of craps. Casino Craps: Shoot to Win! can take you from a novice to a winner! If you want to beat the game of craps, this is the book for you - it has everything you need to know to get the edge over the casinos.


Enjoy!
Why Casino Craps Can't Be Beaten by Bryce Carlson - Blogs - Blackjack Forum, the Blackjack Community
Valid for casinos
Why Casino Craps Can't Be Beaten by Bryce Carlson - Blogs - Blackjack Forum, the Blackjack Community
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
You will have to free before you can post: click the r e g i s t e r link to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Even though this site is primarily dedicated to AP blackjack, several members have indicated that they're also interested in the possibility of beating casino craps, as well.
I also wondered about this, but after several years of study and research I determined that, unfortunately, casino continue reading cannot be beaten with legitimate play.
I hope you guys enjoy it.
But he wasn't, and there isn't.
And therein lies a fascinating tale that is worth a little trip down history lane.
For, you see, at its core, the potential to beat craps comes down to the nature of kinetic energy.
But Newton didn't believe in energy, kinetic or otherwise.
For him there was no such thing!
For Newton, there was mass and there was motion.
And that was it.
Newton knew that unless acted upon by an outside force bodies in motion stayed in motion, and bodies at rest stayed at rest.
So, Newton reasoned that when an outside force acted on a body at rest to create motion it had to impart an "impetus" to the body which overcame the body's inherent inertia.
This force imparted an impetus, P, sufficient to move a mass, m, to a velocity, v.
And that was all there was to it.
But Newton, perhaps the greatest genius of all time, had a bitter rival of almost equal genius.
His name was Gottfried Leibniz.
And Leibniz had a different idea.
He thought there was more to motion than momentum.
He said there was also a "vis viva" or "life force," proportional more info the square of the velocity, that a mass acquires when it's accelerated to a given velocity with respect to another inertial frame.
Newton countered by mocking the whole idea of a putative so-called "life force" as superstitious nonsense, and sarcastically asked Leibniz if perhaps the laying on of hands this web page necessary to impart this special force to masses, and, if so, did it come by the power of God or perhaps Beelzebub.
Leibniz replied that, like everything else, it came by the power of God, and if Newton doubted that perhaps he should take it up with the Pope, or maybe the Archbishop of Canterbury.
And so back and forth it went, year after year, such that during their lifetimes this bitter little tête-à-tête remained unabated, undecided and unresolved -- just one more schlong slam in a long list of schlong slams by two of the greatest minds and brittlest egos in the entire history of great minds and brittle egos.
And then, in 1738, several years after both Newton and Leibniz had died, along came a rather comely young minx by the name of Mme Gabrielle Émilie du Châtelet.
Now, Mme du Châtelet, who happened to be the wife of the Marquis du Châtelet, was not only a libertine deluxe of impressive imagination, but she was also the mistress of Voltaire, several of his friends, and a gifted young woman who somehow amid all click here frolicking found time to be an accomplished natural philosopher, as well.
This was definitely not your everyday wench, royalty or not.
Now, Mme du Châtelet was a keen student of both Leibniz and Newton in fact her French translation of Newton's Principia is still the standardand she marveled that this dispute regarding the fundamental nature of masses in motion had gone on for decades without a resolution.
So, she decided to set up an experiment to settle the matter once and for all.
She reasoned that in an inelastic collision of a rigid undeformable mass with a non-rigid deformable one all of Newton's momentum or Leibniz's vis viva would be absorbed by the deformable mass, and the degree of deformation would determine who was right.
So she set up a simple but elegant experiment in which a small steel cannonball was dropped from a height of several feet into a bucket of potter's clay and the depth of the depression left by the ball was measured.
Then, using Newton's gravity equations, she dropped the ball from a greater height, such that the velocity at impact was calculated to be exactly twice the velocity of the first drop, and, again, measured the depth of the depression left by the ball.
But, if the second depression were four times as deep as the first one, then Leibniz would be right.
So, she performed the experiment and measured the results and, voilà, the second depression was, indeed, four times as deep as the first one.
Leibniz had been right all along.
Poor Leibniz, he had waited a lifetime to beat Newton at something important, and when he finally did he wasn't alive to enjoy it.
Sometimes, the Gods really do have a twisted sense of humor.
Leibniz would be proud.
Okay, so why is it so important that Newton was wrong and Leibniz was right?
It's important because it says that a small change in velocity results in a large change in kinetic energy, which means that when, say, two dice are thrown simultaneously with only a small difference in initial velocity, the differences in their behavior at impact will be large.
Processes in nature tend to either damp or amp as they propagate through space and time.
In those that damp, small differences in more info conditions the Δ of the initial complex Lagrangians become even smaller over time.
But in those that amp, small differences in initial conditions grow large over time.
And because kinetic energy is an exponential function of the square of velocity, tossing dice at craps is an amping process, whereby small differences in initial conditions result in large chaotic differences in the final results.
Now, over the last five years a number of serious, legitimate researchers, including Stanford Wong, myself and others, have sought to determine the truth about so-called AP craps.
Some of these researchers have hoped to show that craps could be beaten, and some have just been intellectually curious.
But, regardless of motive, all of them have beating craps at casinos searched for the truth.
Now, because simulations of precision shooting at casino craps are not feasible, these researchers have generally utilized carefully monitored casino sessions of statistically significant duration with recognized "professional" p-shooters, as well as slow-motion videos of such experts throwing the dice check this out regulation craps tables, to obtain valid useful data.
The results of such studies have been telling.
Virtually without exception, with the monitored "professional" p-shooters the larger click here number of trials the more random the results appear with each die face converging on a random frequency of 1 in 6.
And with the slow-motion videos, it is obvious to everyone viewing them that, no matter how good the throw might look at normal speed, in slow motion it is apparent that a huge amount of uncontrollable randomizing occurs.
In fact, in February, 2009, Wong stated in a post on the bj21.
Watching slo-mo video of dice tosses can be discouraging, and can be harmful to sales of dice books and to sales of dice-tossing instruction.
So, while it is true that no one study is ever completely conclusive, over a five-year period the evidence has piled up as study after study by capable researchers has consistently pointed to only one conclusion: Real-world casino craps cannot be legitimately beaten -- by anyone, anywhere, at any time.
And the exponential, amping nature of kinetic energy is the fundamental reason why.
To see this more clearly consider this analogy: Suppose a world-class MLB pitcher were told to throw curve balls one after another such that each successive pair of curve balls must be thrown at the same speed to within a small fraction of a mile per hour, and have the same curving trajectory within a small fraction of an inch.
No pitcher could ever do this, or would ever even want to, for that matter.
It's not humanly possible.
But that is exactly the kind of control a p-shooter would have to have to have any chance of influencing the dice at all.
And even if it were possible, which it isn't, it STILL wouldn't be enough!
Consider this: The theory of so-called AP craps is built on two plausible-sounding conjectures.
The first one, promoted by Frank Scoblete and Golden Touch Craps, says that if the dice are set properly, thrown on axis with synchronicity, and don't hit the pyramid-studded back wall or at most just "kiss" it lightly with a dead-cat bounceit is possible to exert a sufficient degree of control of the dice to achieve a positive ev.
We'll call this the GTC conjecture.
The second one, promoted by Wong, says that if the dice are set properly, and initially thrown on axis with synchronicity, even if they do hit the pyramid-studded back wall hard, a degree of "correlation" between the two dice can survive that is sufficient to achieve a positive ev.
We'll call this the Wong conjecture.
Let's consider the GTC conjecture first.
On the face of it, it sounds reasonable.
It's definitely a plausible-sounding conjecture.
If the dice are set properly, and stay on axis with synchronicity right to the end, there is no question that sufficient control to achieve a positive ev would result.
That's why it's so seductive.
It sounds doable, if difficult.
It sounds like all it takes is practice.
But, as it turns out, it takes a hell of a lot more than that.
Slow-motion studies of expert throws have repeatedly shown that even if the dice apparently remain on axis with synchronicity right down to the landing something extraordinarily difficult to doif the dice differ by even 0.
Such tosses look great at normal speed, but in slow motion, even on a relatively "dead" table surface, their true random nature can be seen and measured.
As with a pitcher trying to throw successive pairs of identical curve balls, the precision necessary to do it with dice is beyond human capability.
And that's not even counting the pyramid-studded back wall!
When you factor in the pyramids, the whole concept becomes laughable.
Now, let's take a look at beating craps at casinos last best hope for AP casino craps, namely, the Wong conjecture.
Wong is a bright fellow, and he recognized from his early dice studies that maintaining on-axis synchronicity was a pipe dream.
So, still hopeful that craps could be beaten, he developed a more sophisticated theory that posits that, although the dice do not remain on axis with synchronicity after contact with the table and back-wall pyramids, there is a surviving correlation between the two dice's rotations that can potentially reduce double-pitch 7s resulting in a positive ev for the player.
Specifically, Wong asserted that although the pyramids scramble pitch, roll and yaw such that the axis that each die finally assumes will be effectively randomized, a surviving correlation between the two dice may still remain because, 1 due to the law of conservation of energy, 2 the assertion that both dice start off with the same initial kinetic energy, and 3 the assertion that https://eronline.ru/casino/james-casino-royale.html kinetic energy is not preferentially converted into rotational kinetic energy, the number of rotations the two dice undergo across their x, y, z axes, respectively, will remain closely correlated.
In Wong's own words: "Ideally, the dice are still on axis and have equal speed and equal rotation when they hit the pyramids.
The pyramids then randomize the axis of rotation of each die, and reduce the energy of each die approximately equally.
As they leave the wall the dice have random and independent axes of rotation, but will rotate approximately the same number of times before coming to rest.
Being approximately identical in position and motion when they hit the pyramids, and then rotating approximately the same number of times after hitting the pyramids, the end result should be a scarcity of double pitches.
The first one is the fallacy that both dice start off synchronized with the same initial kinetic energy.
Numerous empirical studies have shown that there is always a slight difference in the initial velocities and axial alignments of the two dice and, as previously discussed, because of the exponential amping nature of kinetic energy, these small differences result in big differences in check this out final results.
And secondly, and just as important, the assertion that a rotational correlation between the two dice is maintained during the toss because translational kinetic energy is either not converted into rotational kinetic energy, or, if it is, it is converted to the same degree in both dice, is manifestly false.
This is easily verified when slow-motion videos of expert tosses on regulation craps tables are examined and analyzed.
For example, one die, say, bounces up from the table and squarely hits the base of one of the pyramids and rebounds back with little to no conversion of translational kinetic energy into rotational kinetic energy; the other die, however, bounces up and hits another pyramid, say, a little off center or a little higher up from its base and a significant amount of translational kinetic energy gets converted into primarily roll and yaw rotational kinetic energy.
So, with pitch, roll, yaw and rotation randomized by the table and the pyramids, the assumptions underpinning Wong's correlation conjecture, just as with the GTC on-axis conjecture, do not stand up to either theoretical analysis or the empirical evidence, and, consequently, no surviving correlation between the two dice can be assumed to survive a legal toss in real-world casino craps.
And, again, extensive empirical studies over a five-year period back this conclusion up.
And finally, in April 2011, in a tacit admission that he had been wrong in believing casino craps could be legitimately beaten, Wong removed craps from the list beating craps at casinos "Beatable Casino Games" on his popular bj21.
In addition, a few months later, in October 2011, in an interview about craps on Bob Dancer's popular KLAV radio program, "Gambling With an Edge," Wong admitted that, rather than craps, "if you want to get serious about making money from casinos.
So, blame it on Leibniz, blame it on God, or blame it on the exponential amping nature of kinetic energy, but real-world casino craps cannot be beaten.
But, hey, cheer up, maybe in another universe, far, far away Newton was actually right .
Now, compare this modern casino game to the primitive WWII-era "blanket-roll" game, where the consensus is that a highly-skilled virtuoso p-shooter could, indeed, potentially gain a winning edge.
What is apparent in such a comparison is that the two things that prevent beating the modern casino game -- namely, the exponential amping nature of kinetic energy, and the randomizing power of the back-wall pyramids -- beating craps at casinos absent or neutralized in the blanket-roll game.
In the blanket-roll game there were no back-wall pyramids, and the soft, relatively high-friction army-style blanket was perfect for burning off kinetic energy very rapidly, thus effectively neutralizing kinetic energy's amping nature.
This makes for two very different games, one potentially beatable, and the other not.
They say casinos are born at night, but clearly not last night, as they have very effectively eliminated the exploitable weaknesses in the primitive blanket-roll game.
Now, even though all this means that so-called AP casino craps is left without any credible operational theory or supporting evidence, whatsoever, justifying a belief in its validity, I know none of it is going to have the slightest effect on the so-called AP craps gurus.
They'll just keep on beatin' the drums, pounding out that voodoo vibe for their faithful fans who are all too happy for a rationalization, any rationalization, to justify their inveterate gambling habits.
And does any of it prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that casino craps can't be beaten?
We'll probably never have that kind of proof.
But it does prove beyond a reasonable doubt that casino craps is unbeatable, and in an existential world that is enough for reasonable men.
I have practiced for about a year and half.
I agree with your well written article.
I had held out hope that Wong could be right with his correlation theory but alas beating craps at casinos never held up for me.
I had thought Wong was onto something when he used the all seven set to throw less sevens but that did not work either.
I also found the same thing when viewing the dice in slow motion there was much more random movement then thought.
In theory though it sounds good as you do not need to make the seven not show up for that many more rolls to turn the best bets on the table into positive bets.
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 26 27 28 29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 About Blackjack: The Forum BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity.
That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved.
The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage.
To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side.
Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.
Copyright © 2018All rights reserved.
Blackjack Forum is a message board.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this forum are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the management.

T7766547
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Beat the Craps Out of the Casinos: How to Play and Win [Frank Scoblete] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Until now, craps has been considered an unbeatable casino game because the house has an edge on every bet.


Enjoy!
How to Beat a Casino at Craps: Tips to Win at Craps
Valid for casinos
Beating Casino - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Why Casino Craps Can't Be Beaten If only Isaac Newton had been right, if only he'd been right, then maybe, just maybe, there might really be such a thing as AP casino craps. But he wasn't, and there isn't. And therein lies a fascinating tale that is worth a little trip down history lane.


Enjoy!
Casino Wars - Beating Vegas (Gambling Documentary) - YouTube
Valid for casinos
How to Beat a Casino at Craps: Tips to Win at Craps
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

11 Blackjack Tips the Casinos Don't Want You to Know Bill Kaplan, co-founder of the MIT blackjack team that took Vegas for millions, has a few tricks up his sleeve.


Enjoy!
How to Beat a Casino at Craps: Tips to Win at Craps
Valid for casinos
Why Casino Craps Can't Be Beaten by Bryce Carlson - Blogs - Blackjack Forum, the Blackjack Community
Visits
Dislikes
Comments